Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Strong Kirchheimer vs Jason Kros Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Kros analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Jason Kros Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 0 Kros
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 49.36% of points on their second serve, while Kros has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 45.23% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kros has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 61.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kros has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 49.12% of matches played (W/L 28/ 29), with Kros winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 116). Kros has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22), where as Kros has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Kros being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 2 and Kros winning 0. The last match between Kirchheimer and Kros was at the M15 Tallahassee, 05-12-2019, Second, I.hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Kros have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kirchheimer winning 0 times and Kros 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 0, and Kros 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 286.39 while Kros has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kros has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 37.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kros has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
498
Rank
375
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (273-214)
Career Total W/L
51% (20-19)
35% (6-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kirchheimer VS Kros H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Jason Kros |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) | 68% (43/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (33/43) | 72% (31/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (12/21) | 35% (7/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (25/63) | 30% (19/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kirchheimer VS Kros H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jason Kros
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Jason Kros |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 35% (6/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (18/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (184/210) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 51 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 434.06 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (783/1253) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (543/783) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (232/470) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (36/95) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (424/1219) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (6/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
2
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Sekou Bangoura
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jason Kros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 7-6(5) 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Jason Kros
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Kros
Player
Maximiliano Estevez
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jason Kros
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jason Kros
Player
Alex Knaff
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Kirchheimer Vs Kros Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
